|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
   |
Posted - 2010.02.25 23:18:00 -
[1]
Some people are worried that if CVA get beaten to empire, it will be the end of NRDS in Providence and healthy roaming grounds.
It won't be.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 00:09:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: XavierVE
Edited by: XavierVE on 26/02/2010 00:05:25
Quote:
Some people are worried that if CVA get beaten to empire, it will be the end of NRDS in Providence and healthy roaming grounds
If you think AAA will let you install a real NRDS in Providence, then you're on something.
AAA don't tell us how to manage our ROE. Although, I'm sure they would love it if we managed NRDS in providence - it's not like they would have to follow it.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 09:01:00 -
[3]
Originally by: dastommy79
To bitter dog; if we capture all their base, where will i farm noobs?
Well, if you cast your mind back a few years, CVA and UK kind of divided Providence up between them and both ran NRDS. Noobs were welcomed in both areas, provided they didn't take sides in the lolRP wars.
So it depends how Providence is carved up - but imo it should remain NRDS and welcoming of new players. I wouldn't like to see providence being held by major powers or NBSI alliances, that would ruin it for sure.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 09:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Sa'Shena
This doesn't make any sense, since if AAA, one of the largest fleet contributors in the region doesn't want to follow NRDS but you superficially have NRDS, then what stops your allies from just running roughshod over everyone in your space?
lolz... how is this any different to Providence under CVA? Do AAA stop roaming it to respect their NRDS ideals? Of course not.
The truth is it wouldn't be any different, except UK aren't as anally retentive as CVA and won't try to force everyone to follow our standings list. Nor would we go on suicidal imperial crusades into the space of powerful alliances 
Also I'm pretty sure we don't want to hold nearly as much space as CVA do, which means more space for neutrals and young alliances looking for their first peice of 0.0
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 10:09:00 -
[5]
Originally by: 128th ABC123
Yo Butter, ima going to let you pass, but why the **** would you tag along with -A- if you are interested in keeping provi NRDS?
Well, UK are an NRDS alliance. Always have been.
We currently run NBSI in Providence only because CVA's business model relies on neutrals using their stations to generate ISK. If CVA were pushed out, we'd have no need to continue this exception to the NRDS ideals we have.
As for AAA's ROE - we don't tell people how to manage their own standings. And AAA are kind of shooting CVA, so it would be pretty silly of us not to join in the fight against our mortal RP enemy, right?
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 10:16:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Mya ElleTerego
100 mil says ushra khan failsauces trying to babysit 30 stations and all of provi. Sorry butter, but I just dont see it happening. I am going to go out on a limb and forecast a derelict region full of ninja ratters that looks strikingly like stain region, but with crappier rats.. But I wish you guys luck anyways.
hehe, you'd be right about us not wanting 30 stations, in fact I'm 90% sure we don't want any more than we have, and we wouldn't run Providence in the same way CVA does. Especially not in the post-Dominion era, cos it would just be an annoying burden.
There are plenty of people out there though, who would be happy to live in Providence, given a constellation or station of their own... and I'd be very suprised if some of the existing holders didn't change sides (despite public denials from some of them, I know there is talk behind the scenes and some are more eager to jump ship than others).
And as UK have run NRDS in Providence before quite succesfully, doing it again doesn't seem like a huge stretch of the imagination to me... of course it would also be the end of us, who knows :p
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 12:33:00 -
[7]
Who said anything about rent?
For an NRDS providence to work, people need to feel it is 'their' space and something worth holding onto - rent won't achieve that. Then there really would be a an arguement for us to provide protection and hand-holding against ebil roamers.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 16:27:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Areo Hotah
Paxton was neutral, until UK started to shoot them. "If you're not with us, you're most likely a spy and against us."
You were CVA friends, and anything but neutral. Seems you don't know your own alliances history.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.26 16:36:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/02/2010 16:37:06
Originally by: Areo Hotah
Friends, but neutral in the conflict between CVA and UK.
And all you did was drive us even further to the CVA side.
You picked your side by supporting CVA when UK were driven out of Providence the first time around. And let's be clear - your pilots were the ones following CVA orders to set UK red and shoot at us.
We don't hold a grudge though, and neither should you ;)
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.03.01 20:27:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Suitonia
4,500 versus 15,000+ is hardly a fight.
This isn't about ~goodfights~
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
|
|
|
|
| |
|